Customer Reviews Hoka Rincon 4

Good

I loved the look of the show and they're nice and light with great cushioning. They just didn't fit the way shoes my size normally for in the toe area. They were rubbing against my big toe so I actually had to return them. Maybe they just fit a little tighter than Hoka shoes I've had in the past. Just something to be aware of.

Loved this show when I first became a marathon runner 7 years ago. Rincon 1 and 2 were amazing on the feet. This version of Rincon 6 and 7 just doesn't compare to the first version. They don't feel the same on the feet .

This update improves the interior of the shoe and it's very smooth for sockless runners like me. I've run on Rincons since they were incepted, and I really loved that the shoe was perfect on the first run right out of the box. This update changed the shape of the front of the shoe - much less room for the toes. The 4 activates my Morton's neuroma (sharp nerve pain in the middle toe) in ways that the previous models never did. It's not a sizing issue, it's a design issue - much less room in the toe box. My foot is all choked up in there. Here, Hoka seems to have replicated the basic trainers that Nike made 20 years ago. The shoe is too expensive for its features, and causes this seasoned runner foot pain, so it will have to go back. Hoka, please try again. I loved the Clifton until you changed it, now the same with the Rincon. I'd love to know more about how your design team makes decisions on how/when to update your shoe models.

Seems to be not as comfortable as your other shoes, little narrow for my foot even though I had order wide. Run slightly smaller than the other models.

I've run in Rincons for years. The Rincon 4 seems better for walking. It is not a competitive running shoe. It lacks bounce. I'll have to look elsewhere. Rincon 4s are not good.

Rincon generation 1 was probably one of my all time favorites. Not sure what changed since the 3+. Feels stiffer, less supportive, sizing off, cheaper foam

The sides of these shoes started to come unglued after only a few wears. Very disappointing quality, especially for something that should last much longer.

Earlier version of the Ricon was much better. In fact I'll go back to using my older pair

Great for walking. Heels started to come apart around 120 miles. Didn't happen with my challenger 8s.

I used to love the Rincon, but the narrowing of the toe box has changed my opinion. It is now too tight and uncomfortable for my runs and I won't be buying this again unless the toe box goes back to the size it was.

Don't know needed larger size and wider. Not offered.

2

My shoes wore well but quickly wore out. Ive almost slipped and fallen a few times. I submitted a warranty claim and it took 10+ days to tell me they didn't get all the pictures. I fell like the warranty team is just making it difficult so I don't give up...about to just go buy some brooks.

This is my second pair of hokas The other ones lasted me six months like all my other sneakers. These lasted less than three months.

Primary day to day shoe as well as gym shoe. Sole was great to start with but for the price the sole wore out and now the shoes are just trash

The Rincon 1 was a great shoe. Light, a bit wider in the tow, not an overwhelming stack height, the sole was good for a road to trail unfortunately with every iteration the shoe became more narrow, and added more and more cushion. The 4s crossed the line and I can't run in these shoes anymore. Seems like shoe companies just need to keep pushing this stuff to the extreme! Soon we'll be running on foam stilts! I was a dedicated Rincon customer - sadly now I'll have to find something else.

These shoes feel like walking and running on a cloud. The color is also nice. However, shortly after the 3 month mark and only walking or running approximately 130 miles on paved roads, the bottom of these shoes is wearing terribly. Unfortunately, the bulk of the tread is gone and a hole has been worn in the top where it comes into contact with the achilles heel. I've contacted Hoka and it does not appear they are going to honor any kind of warranty on these shoes, as the 3rd party they employ to do the warranty, has claimed this is normal wear and tear. I would love to recommend these but at 3 months, and in this price point, I expect more durability and longevity. From all I've read, these shoes should last an average of 300-500 miles. I personally don't recommend purchasing these.

literally the 3 is the best running on the planet. is it durable and long lasting - no. but 9 pairs in i wouldnt change a thing. run 250-300 miles and reload a new pair. like everyone is saying . please just admit mistake , listen to thousands of runners and bring back the 3

Less bulky shoe, looks better, but lack cushioning that the Rincon has been famous for.