Customer Reviews L.L.Bean 1912 Straight Leg Sweatpants

Returned the sweatpants. I like thicker sweatpants, and these are rather thin. The fit was not good for me because the rise was a bit short. I llked the style, though. Sigh.

I've liked the quality of LLBean items so I thought I'd give these sweatpants a try. While I liked the weight of the material the one thing I haven't liked is how stretched out they get after a short time of wearing them. They become extremely baggy and don't look good at all. I would not order another pair.

Very nice sweat pants if you don't mind floods! The pants are nice but run about 6 inches short after they are washed.

The pants run short in the leg. I would not purchase again because feel the quality is not up to Bean standards. Have 2 other Bean winter styles that are superb in comparison.

They're nice. Comfortable. They could be a little thicker fabric and a little cheaper ( like sweats used to be)I do like the straight leg without gathering at the ankle. Wish the inseam was 31".

Wish you would make these soft, warm true fleece sweatpants in the wide leg style similar to your 24/7 sweats. Was hoping the straight leg would hang better, but they are still very narrow and tend to cling. Wide leg would be more comfortable in my opinion.

Sadly, these didn't work for me. The material was good but the fit was off.

I really liked the rose color (deeper than in the photos) and the material seemed to be soft and substantial. However, as others have noted, the waist was too big, even when tied tighter (I looked like my grandfather in his pants -- not a good look). And the tie was flimsy. I wanted to exchange for a smaller size, but the legs are pretty straight and the ankles sort of slim (I don't want bellbottoms but they weren't quite right) and I think they'd be unflattering. I'm a pretty average size with a muscular seat and legs (nothing too extreme) -- Bean -- when are you going to learn that most women have curves (at least until after middle age)? For years I have avoided buying your clothing because you generally don't get fit right (and this is another example).

The fabric is heavy, soft and warm, cozy for Northern California. Color (rose) is cheerful. The waist feels a bit like cardboard and doesn't pull up nicely with the drawstring. Overall they seem baggy for a small. I used to be 5'5' but my age has shrunk me down. I presently weigh 102.

The pants are nice, but the waist was too big. Most size smalls fit me, but this one was too big. Even after tightening and tying the string they were too big.

These pants are well made with soft quality fabric. However, I had to return them because the small I ordered had large hips. I have narrow hips and the legs fit to where the hips ballooned out.

Small is too long and XS too small in hips. Very soft feel, wish they had fit

Comfortable. These are unisex-sized, not Women's size.

Loved at first try on, so washed, hemmed up, wore rest of day, and they became increasingly baggy in a few hrs. Will try washing in hot water, as very comfortable & warm & would like to wear in public.

Pants are generally ok, except that the leg length is too short, I have the average length legs, I would purchase a long size if available

Sizing is a little off. Very warm and comfy. They're big in the top area , making the fit not so flattering. Other than that they would have been very comfy!

Waistline has no elastic, just a skinny drawstring (also not elastic) in a wide band. Does not make for a good fit.

The cotton is very soft, and the pants are well-made. Unfortunately they're too long. Please offer them in BLACK and in petite.

I have searched high an low for nice women's straight leg sweats. Ordered the ultrasoft sweats and loved the way they fit, but they are not truly sweat pants. Ordered the 1912 expecting the same fit, but heavier material. The material was just what I wanted, but when I tried them on they felt too short in the body. Laid them over the other pants that fit perfectly and the length from the waist to the crotch is about an inch shorter on the 1912 sweats - that is 2" shorter if you count front and back. Uncomfortable.

Ordered small regular as I have before. These are about 2 inches too short.

I ordered a 2X as the size chart showed I would need a 3X but I have never worn a 3x so I ordered a 2X and had to return them as they are way too big. They were of a soft cozy material.

Inseam says 30" but when they are on they stretch takes up some length. They would be great if you are short but not for average height or taller women.

Thee fabric is wonderful. The leg and ankles are to tight. I am used to LLBean products being BIG for the size -- the waist was fine that's all.

Super soft material but the pants are short and the waist is below the natural waistline.

These are slimmer cut sweatpants and would wirk but the crotch is short. I am not one to wear sweatpants on my hips so these are going back.