Customer Reviews Wrangler Riggs Workwear Ranger Pant

Nice looking jeans, but much too heavy to try to wear in the summer in southeastern US. If I had truly known how heavy they were, I would have gotten something else lighter in weight and thickness, and possibly have gotten these in the late fall to wear during cold weather only.

Bought a pair of them super comfy and material is heavy duty and has a lot of good features. The cons are sizing off, the length is longer even going down a inch. And small in the waist go up 2 sizes. Other than that that I'll be buying more pairs in the future.

These jeans shrunk drastically when washed in cold water and I'm unable to button them. Not happy with them at all. The same size jeans I wear in your other brand of jeans.

This was the second pair of Wrangler pants that I purchased. These were a lot heavier than the first pair I bought.

Quality is excellent but uncomfortable to work in pants that are too small (36) or too big (38) and I've tried both. How about making a 37.

For all around use, in the yard and casual.

I usually wear size 36 or 38. I bought size 38 and their wayyyy to small i could barely get them on. Might want to go up a size or two next time

I just got 2 new pairs i have 12 other pairs and the pockets are thinner than they use to be. I put my hand in the pocket pants off and noticed i could see my finger tips through the pocket when i pressed them against the pocket. All my other ones you cannot. The pockets seem a little shorter also. The out side rip stop materials seems thinner but maybe they have not been washed and dried enough.

AVERAGE

I've been wearing Riggs Wear Ranger Cargo pants for about 10 years. The pockets, cargo pockets, and pocket seems are great. The sizing is terrible. The actual waist sizing is consistently 4 inches bigger than the tagged size. Actual examples from my pants: tagged waist is 34", actual waist is 38"; tagged waist is 33", actual waist is 37 1/4"; tagged waist is 32". actual waist is 36". If this problem happened once, I'd think it was a mistake, this is consistent in 10 individual pants.

I have numerous pairs of the Riggs Ranger Cargo Work Pants. I recently ordered 6 new pairs of pants. The new pants fit differently than my original pants. The new pants are not produced in the same factory. The new pants fit very tight in the thigh and butt area. They are almost to tight for work. I am a huge fan of my original Riggs Ranger Cargo Pants, not a huge fan of the new ones I purchased. I may have to look at other brands, unless they go back to the original pattern or factory. Why did they mess with a good thing??

I purchased these pants for my husband and even used the fit guide to make sure they were the right size. They were too small. He liked the pants, so I reordered them but maybe go up a size if you're ordering from the Big and Tall section.

Compared to other Wrangler pants I recently purchased these ran smaller in the waist. I have 4 pairs of Wrangler Ripstop Cargo pants for daily wear. So I purchased these for working in. Waist was too small even though same dimensions as the others. Will be returning, and Wrangler wants me to foot the shipping back even though their sizing is incorrect. Would have tried in if these were sold anywhere in the area I live, but they are not.

I ordered size 38x32 but the length is way too long! Length is more like a 36 cause the legs drag the ground. Maybe it was incorrectly labeled as far as the leg length goes. Had I known when ordering I would have ordered a 30in length. Material quality is great!

WAIST MEASUREMENT / SMALL . MY WAIST IS 44". NICARAGUA 44" = 42". PROBABLY 46" (BY YOUR MEASUREMENT STANDARD) WOULD FIT HOPEFULLY ???? ALL MY WRANGLER PANTS ARE 44" WAIST AND FIT W/ FEW EXCEPTIONS!! I AM A WRANGLER MAN !!!

These Riggs work pants are being returned because it seems that Wranger is deleting two critical belt loops. Moreover, I see that they are doing this on many other pant styles. Work pants for people working in the field require seven belt loops. Three of those critical loops are essential in the back of the pants. These loops keep your belt from creeping upward during frequent bending, standing, and walking. The belt loops prevent issues with load-board construction belts. Work pants without these loops are uncomfortable and unprofessional, and I refuse to consider them real work pants. I understand that Wranger is working to save money on production costs, but I want all seven belt loops at this price point. Our team will purchase our workwear elsewhere if this trend at Wrangler continues. Please furnish seven belt loops with all Riggs work pants, or the product line will be rendered insufficient and incapable for their market.

Not even 4 hours into using them and the side pocket tore.

I wear size 48/32. I got these in 48/32. This wasn't a small difference in size between manufacturers. All of my pants, work or otherwise are same size. Fit fine. I couldn't get the button and hole closer than 2 inches apart on these. Maybe it was an anomaly. Maybe not.

I received my and put it to works rigth away,however on the very first few hours of me wearing one the pants it teardown, a huge rip rigth on the front part of it in between my legs,it realy killed my day!

the material is very poor the fabric is very thin and cheap and it feels very tight on the waist

Product was to small sent back waiting for refund back on my card on all items

Pants too small to wear and less flexible than implied. We really wanted a different Wrangler pant that IS more flexible, but you don't offer big sizes in that line of pants. We tried something the Riggs line and were disappointed. We are sending back these pants, unworn. If you should begin offering larger sizes in the ATG line, we'll try it. Also, consider larger women's sizes in those same pants styles. That would help immensely!

The material of the pants is what you would expect but it gave a size five times larger I even measured myself idk if it was a mistake but I would love someone to reach me out for a refund because I can't find it in the website please and thank you. What I ordered was a 40Wx30L in the last picture those pants were the same brand but different product with the same size.

I have purchased several pairs over the last few years. They don't seem to hold up well, I had 2 rip in the crotch seam and three rip above the double knee.

You know, it'd be great to come here and give these pants a great review. They certainly are very well made, nicely designed, could have been a home run. But. The sizing is just not even in the ball park. Much too small in the waist, like 3" too small, and much too long in the length. This is a big problem with offshore product lately, and not just for Wrangler. The marked sizing is completely wrong and there doesn't seem to be any QC going on to rectify the situation. Companies seem to take the marked size at face value. Now, if the sizing is a little larger than what is indicated on the product, that's one thing: you can live with that. But when the sizing is too small for a fella to get into, well, that is a deal breaker. These are going to have to go back and there doesn't seem to be a way to get a size that will fit without taking a chance, so I will be asking for a refund. Too bad. Nice pants otherwise.