Customer Reviews Acorn Slipper Sock Cotton
Write A ReviewRating Summmary:
335
335 total reviewsReview Breakdown:
56%5Rated 5 stars out of 5
9%4Rated 4 stars out of 5
9%3Rated 3 stars out of 5
10%2Rated 2 stars out of 5
15%1Rated 1 star out of 5
Customer Fit Survey:
54%"Felt true to size"
63%"Felt true to width"
81%"No arch support"
Additional Reviews
Sort by:
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Destination XL
Stitching is poor and comes loose right out of the package.
Bob,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Comfort1Rated 1 star out of 5
Style4Rated 4 stars out of 5
Runs SmallRuns Large
Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Poor SupportGreat Support
I have been buying Acorn Slipper Socks pretty much since they were invented. I recently wore out a pair sized M 10½-11½, so I reordered and received the same size. While the length was correct, the soles are considerably narrower, they are almost impossible to pull on - and I do mean pull, and the sock height is substantially greater. A friend had the same experience about a year ago. I thought he might have ordered the wrong size or the slipper socks were mismarked, but apparently neither was true. It seems to me that what Acorn has done is go to unisex sizing, and the narrower sole is the result. I should point out that the width in Zappos is specified as M, which is the size I typically wear. No W is offered. Too bad. I really loved these things.
Alan, Zappos Customer,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Totes
With the new Acorn, your heel rest on "hump." So it keep sliding off. I will never buy Acorn again!
Anonymous,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Totes
Not only uncomfortable but unwearable. I had a pair many years ago that were very comfortable. These were truly disappointing. I will return them.
Anonymous,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Destination XL
I had to return the product and the original total cost to me was [$] and the refund amount was only $44.46? Not cool.
Suzy,
0 found this review helpful.