Customer Reviews Dickies Temp-iQ Short Sleeve Flex Coverall

Very long in the torso and legs. Not for petite ladies but I love it conceptually

Nice but too big! Don't know what to do...........

I bought the white coveralls but had to return them. The fabric was so thin it was literally sheer! I don't know about you, but I'd rather not show off my undergarments to the whole wide world. Maybe it's not as noticeable in other colors... Regardless I was very disappointed by the quality of these coveralls.

The fit is kind of big for me (I'm 5'2" & ordered a small) which I don't mind. I have a pair of black Dickie's coveralls that are kind of baggy but still comfy & one of my fave things to wear. The biggest problem with the white coveralls is the material. They're basically see-through, but which is super unfortunate. For the price, you'd assume they could use a thicker material that isn't see-through.

Legs waay too long, chest too small. 2 stars for the olive color. Returned.

These overalls are snug around the chest and huge around the hips. I bought a medium and a large going one would fit. They did not fit me at all. I'm 5'3" with a higher waist. My usual pant size is 6 and my shirt size is 8. I will be returning these.

Awkward fit for someone with curves and more sheer than expected.

Thin almost see through material and frumpy in the booty area.

The fit is much baggier unlike how it looks on the model. The white colorway was completely see-through. Super unfortunate because I was so excited about this.

Very thin material. Not sure if it's worth the price of product.

The bottom half of the coverall fits very awkwardly.

The fabric is quite thin. The zipper catches easily. Fit is good but overall it feels like a cheaply made item...I guess you get what you pay for. I work in a studio environment and was hoping for proper heavy duty coveralls with a women's cut. This seems like a joke for women who want the look but don't actually work hard.

It was a lot more thin than I expected. I needed something heartier. The pockets were the thickest part. I wonder if the men's are thin like the women's....

Bought for 5'4 " daughter and the pants are way way way too long for her. The waist is not tight even though she is 125 lbs. she didn't like the fit because the waist falls low and doesn't show off her figure.

The fabric itself is very thin and see through. You will have to wear a full outfit underneath to not show all your under garments. The top is made for very busty women and the legs are made for toothpicks. The butt pleating is very unflattering and makes your butt look flat and/or like you're wearing a diaper. Such a disappointment!

Sizing is way too big and the overalls are see through.

The material on theses is very thin. You can't actually work in these. Pretty much just for looks.

These coveralls are so thin and pick up lint like nobody's business. I bought the pink ones for fun, and they were essentially see through. I returned them. Large fit well for me. 170 pounds, 5'4"

I bought these to garden in and the fabric is paper thin. I have the Dickies overalls which I love for it's style and durability, but these coveralls failed to meet my expectations.

They're ok. The seams are off, I measure in at 44-32-40 and a medium is big on me even after a wash. they're way too long, like i had at least 6 inches cut off. (i'm 5'5") the pockets are super thick which is nice, but the rest of the material is kinda thin and flimsy. i got them on a black friday sale, so at least i didn't pay full price.

If you're familiar with the men's coveralls, these are a huge disappointment. The quality of the material is so cheap it's see-through, they're not durable, and don't have similar utility pockets to the men's version. This version fashion, not workwear. Women work and have gnarly jobs too. We deserve quality coveralls. C'mon.

I was thrilled to find pink coveralls online. Weirdly, my torso was too long for an XL and I could use a size up but that's not an option here. Men's sizes go up to 4XL. Why not offer the same sizes in women's coveralls as well? Additionally, the fabric and make didn't seem as durable as men's coveralls. Bummer.

I love how this thing looks, but it's cheaply made and very thin which is odd for "work wear." The zipper is one that gets stuck constantly and I can feel that detail wasn't taken into account. But it looks suuuper cool.

These would be perfect... if I were 5'7" or taller. They're VERY long in the legs (which I can easily hem... I'm used to that being 5'3"), but the top/torso is so long that they bunch up and poof out if I keep the waistband at my waist! If I pull them down to avoid the poof, the waistband is at my crotch and the crotch is almost to my knees. I normally wear a M or S, so I went with a S after reading reviews that they run large. Super bummed. Wish Dickies could get women's wear right.... they've got the idea, but they're only patterning for long people!

I have been wearing the men's short sleeved coveralls for two years and love them as workwear. I saw the women's version and bought two different colors. Unfortunately they do not work with my body type and are uncomfortable to wear when I need to bend over, climb ladders, etc. I usually wear a size 4 and I am a bit smaller on the top compared to the bottom. I bought the XS based on other reviews and at first it seemed like a great fit- the legs were tapered but not too fitted and I had lots of room at the top. However, the crotch is low and makes it difficult to kneel or bend. When kneeling the leg fabric becomes tight around my legs (not much give) and I feel like I have two sausages for legs stuffed into these coveralls. Something else that is weird- the vertical leg seams are off. the outside seams are almost on the front of my legs and the inside seams are really far back. It seems like these coveralls are more of a fashion statement versus real workwear. I appreciate all the color choices, but the men's coveralls fit my body so much better and allow me to work comfortably and without feeling self conscious.