Customer Reviews Under Armour Golf Performance Polo 2.0
Write A ReviewRating Summmary:
182
182 total reviewsReview Breakdown:
63%5Rated 5 stars out of 5
15%4Rated 4 stars out of 5
2%3Rated 3 stars out of 5
9%2Rated 2 stars out of 5
10%1Rated 1 star out of 5
Customer Fit Survey:
83%"Felt true to size"
100%"Felt true to width"
Additional Reviews
Sort by:
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Comfort2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Style2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Verified Purchase
Color looks more Black. and its really Green. Fits snug, and I'm slim. It's nice, much different than most UW golf shirts as they are always way too large, made for fat guys. We'll try a large in this version.
Anonymous, Zappos Customer,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I am 5 10 185 and have ordered large size polos in the past. I just ordered two new large "loose" golf polos and they are very tight around body and arms. These are not loose at all and I dont understand why that term is used. I really like Under Armour products and don't want to go to another brand polo. I would suggest if one has any kind of an athletic build and does bicep curls that they go up one size. I wish I had.
Badbishop,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I bought a few of these polos after reading some of the postive reviews. My only problem is that they are far too long when left untucked. Good for for the office but other than that they are pretty useless. I was looking for a comfortable, fairly casual shirt that will not shrink after two washes. The search goes on.
SF146,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I have 13 of these shirts in what I will call the " Classic" style, they are really the perfect shirt, size was perfect, comfortable, and they kept their shape and color, I could not have been more happy, that is until I recently bought 2 new polo shirts, they are smaller, tighter and the material snags easier than before. If it say's Under Armour you can bet I probably have it in my closet, but these new style shirts, I do not like, Please bring back the Classic polo, it was the perfect shirt.
Sperry65,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
Now a picture of the actual color for Neo Pulse. I was hoping for Hot Pink, like the picture appears. Otherwise. nice shirt
Pyrex,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
The colors are great! But the sizing and fit are way smaller than previous years' shirts. And I have many of them. I wouldn't characterize these as "loose" fit. I don't like the piping across the back either. I returned the two (2) I bought.
Under Armour: please go back to the original shirts from previous years - these are not loose! Lose the piping too!
Rocko999,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
Great shirt in every other way but a little more room in the chest would help - the sleeves are a little short too. Seems easy to fix.
Mbruhe,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Comfort2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Style2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Verified Purchase
I ordered an XL and a XXL...the XL was too snug, and the XXL was too big...its a really nice shirt though! I just feel like there was too big of a difference between the two sizes. And the XL fit is def more a "slim fit" shirt. I felt myself "tugging" at it the entire. But it is a nice quality shirt.
Anonymous, Zappos Customer,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I love the old design of the performance shirts, loose and comfortable. I bought 3 of the new performance shirts, I was excited to see new colors and paid no attention to the new design. The shirts were tight, arms as well as torso. I am very disappointed with the new design.
CSButler,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I thought I ordered the wrong size when I put it on but it was an XXL just like I had ordered numerous times same product. I have to send them back sleeves are short and everything is a lot tighter. I used to order XXL and the fit was perfect even a little loose if I want to continue wearing these shirts I'll have to get XXXL I guess. The returning of shirts you've been ordering for years is a huge disappointment especially when your leaving for a golf trip.
South1,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I was good for 2-4 of these every Spring in different colors. I am really disappointed in the new fit. Why mess with perfection? I have a decently athletic build but this is way too trim compared to previous versions.
Would it be so hard to offer in a "Classic" and "Slim" fits? I am keeping my shirt to wear on the golf course but it is a little tight for the office. Glad I only bought one color to start after reading the other reviews and thinking "how different could it be?"
JBob,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I own many of the older style polo. Great fit. Loose enough where the shirt is very comfortable, but not sloppy. The new "athletic" fit for 2014 runs too tight for me. A large was perfect before and is now too short and tapered. Bring back the old polo!
UAFan14,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall2Rated 2 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I own this shirt in five other colors...all Large/Loose fitted. I ordered the dark green in Large/Loose and it fits tighter than all the others. The yoke is slightly different and the tail is also shorter. I really like the fit of the others...disappointed in the slight change in size/fit
Gdrobi,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I purchased 6 of these "performance" polo's for work. Had them professionally embroidered with my companies logo on them and they looked great all of them but the two grey ones, one outing and each of the grey polo got discolored form being in the sun! seriously? the black and white have been holding strong but wow the grey color didn't last a month! very poor materials used in the grey ones. these were not cheap and are supposed to last as they are a performance top for a sport.
Diesel13,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I purchased several UA performance Polos, loose fit, heat gear made in Peru that were a great fit & well made. I subsequently purchased an additional polo made in Jordan. The collar is poorly constructed & crinkles. The fit is tight. The shirt is comparable to much cheaper brands. I have shopped for new performance polos & they appear worse. Also can't find heat gear tee shirt with fitted shoulder any longer. UA has lost a previously satisfied and loyal customer.
Bobp,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
We ordered a few of these polos in small and they were were way too big, both too wide and too long. Any recommendation on a fitted polo?
Bexx,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I've usually had good luck with UA polos, but these are sized terribly! The medium was too tight in the chest, so I exchanged for a large. The large hung halfway to my knees! There needs to a size between medium and large or at the very more of a gradual change between the sizes. This also goes for the Playoff polo too.
TreCool883,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I bought two of these performance polo shirts for my husband. He has a half dozen now, and loves them. The problem is, these new ones are sized differently. The sleeves are shorter and the body of the shirt is smaller in both width and length. I received the order today...returning tomorrow. After reading all the other reviews...does this tell UA something? Lots of unhappy customers!! And...same comments!! At least, it should have been noted in the product description that the sizing has changed. Lost a customer.
Disappointed10,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I tried the new performance polo and the fit is nothing like the old performance polo. I don't understand why you would make this shirt so snug. The sleeves have been shortened and
the fit is more tailored than loose. Please go back to the old style or make both the standard and tailored shirts.
Fingerroll,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
In 2007-2010 Under Armour made the best polo of all time. For some reason they decided to change the cut and the sleeve length. Why ? The athletic cut is too tight the,shirt grips under the arm it and the sleeves jet out . I have not bought one for years. I am still hopeful that the shirt will return to its original glory.. Huge mistake , fix it.
Joeyt43,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I learned long ago not to buy golf shoes without trying them on first. And now a new lesson learned with your shirts. I have a closet full of performance polo shirts and they are all the same size, fit, and comfort. I am disappointed that you have changed standards of these new versions of this old shirt. By comparison they are no longer "loose" fit. The sleeves are measurably shorter and the chest is not the same width. I can no longer rely on your sizing and will no longer purchase your products without trying them on. However, none of the local stores or your outlets stock the full line of golf shirts. Oh well.
Ja2626,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I have many of these polos in an older version and they are still my absolute favorite shirts that I own. However I purchased a few of the new ones and the sizing was changed so drastically that they were unwearable. Please keep in mind if you purchase one, you may need one or even two sizes bigger than you normally wear.
Nygiants13,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I have 2 of the original polo shirts and the fit and comfort are great. I decided to purchase another only to find out that their different now and do not fit like the others. Instead of a loose fit they are more of a fitted cut. Why did they change them? They were perfect the way they were.
Flattop,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
I have NINE of the classic polos (1000490). They are absolutely perfect! Some of them are many years old.
Then UA comes out with the 2.0. (1242755). I'm thinking, "Oh great! They must have improved it!"
Not the case. UA designers decided to make it much WORSE.
1. Sleeves too short
2. Body too tight
3. Shoulder seam uncomfortable, doesn't give or stretch
4. Very uncomfortable for golf
5. Right shoulder logo scratchy on inside
6. Chest too tight
I'm 6'-4" and 240. I have worn a 2XL for 20 years. I can barely get this shirt on in a 2XL! Took it back, bought a 3XL. The fit is awkward.
Please bring back the old version and call it "Classic".
To be blunt, I hate this shirt.
BigGolfer240,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall1Rated 1 star out of 5
Reviewed at Under Armour
The new polo is not near as comfortable as the old design. It runs way to tight.
The old polos were perfect. I don't understand why you would change the entire
fit of the shirt. Very disappointed, Bring back the OLD POLO.
JaxsonX,
0 found this review helpful.