Customer Reviews Hoka Mach 6

1

As unlike Hoka Mach's as ever. I have always used the Hoka Mach exclusively for running. For context I run 12 - 15 miles per week. The Mach 6 has an unusually narrow toe box (I typically wear medium width B) with a very short tongue that cut into the anterior part of my ankle. I could not make it past the second mile running. I wish they would bring back the Mach supersonic, that was the "incomparable" of Hoka Machs! At this point I'm only keeping it for its looks and because it would probably be too much of a hassle to return. I now wear on days I sit at work :(

I usually love my hoka, they are my go to sneakers. These Mach 6 did not live up to what is expected from hoka. I rotate and started wearing these in November and by December they had no support left in them. I remember putting on my very first pair and felt like I was walking on air and could walk forever. I am 71 years old and this pair did not last six weeks, no stability or support left in them. Not sure if they were just a bad batch but very disappointed.

Despite the fact we have bought several size 13 Men's Hokas, the same style we always get was too small. Very disappointing that we had to return them. Size consistency is a must if you expect customers to be satisfied ordering on line.

I have a great fitting pair of Mach 5s. Assumed these would fit the same. Not the case. Too tight in right toe box, which caused immediate pain and eventual blister. So disappointed.

I have been wearing the on Swiss Cloud X shoes and I know a few people with the Hoka Mach a 6 sneaker. It came in feels and looks cheap, I put it on and it did not fit like a 10.5 felt like an 11. I already started my return process.

Clifton 9 was my first Hoka Pair, and I bought it in 7 WIDE (my usual size) as I have a bunions. I loved my Clifton 9, so thought to try something else in HOKA in wide fit. This time I bought Mach 6 in size 7 Wide, but this wide shoes are not as wide as Clifton and feels little tight. The opening of the shoes is also narrow and its not easy to wear (slide through as Clifton). Not happy with this purchase.

They are not comfy at all, has to return it so sad the quality and feet cushioning change. Please bring back mach 5, been using hoka since rincon 3.

Couldn’t tell. Shoes were obviously worn. Dirty with mud and leaves on the soles

Horrible shoes, shocked. I wear a 9D in Clifton, Bondi, and Challenger and have bought Hokas for years (Clifton 3 through current). These Machs are NOT a 9D. Best their AI chat can tell me is that "The Mach is designed to fit snugger". Then make it fit like a snug 9D instead of fitting like a 9 regular. Now they need to go back and I wasted their Black Friday discount expecting them to use the same size they use for 3 other lines of theirs. Never again.

VERY narrow, and I even ordered a wide. The toe box is tiny and the tongue of this show extends beyond the shoe and pushes firmly into my leg. Very uncomfortable.

I ordered all black shoes, MUST be all black for work, the cushion is grey.

I did not receive this package - Tracking shows it was delivered to a different town and no reply from zappos when I emailed them about it.

I took care of these sneakers (even avoided wearing them in the rain), but they developed holes in less than 5 months of wearing them. My previous sneakers (from a different brand) took over 4 years to develop holes in the same area. So much money wasted.

Shoes were very narrow in the toe box to the point that my toes would go numb and I have narrow feet. There is a difference between having cushioned soles and soles that are so soft that they become unstable. These are unstable. I returned them and will look at other brands.

Shoes is uncomfortable on the air treadmill. The discomfort runs to the hips

Very disappointed..... Shoes looked cheap but they were not! Will send back!

I have owned Hoka for yrs and these are the 1st pair that are too narrow for my feet to not have pain! Not sure what is different. Size should be the same.

Hoka has always been very inconsistent with sizing across models. But now they've outdone themselves. They are now inconsistent between two different pairs within the SAME model. I bought a pair of Mach 6 last year in the size 7.5 and everything was fine. I bought a new pair in the same size that arrived yesterday. Right off the bat I thought they looked small but thought nothing of it. I put them on today to go for a walk: they are WAY too short and it's agony for my toes. It feels like I went at least one size down but the tag still says 7.5 US size. HOW did they manage to mess up the sizing WITHIN the same model??? Did they hear about quality control? I am furious because this is money that I 100% wasted. I will never buy Hokas again and will switch brands. Comfort is nice, but size consistency is more important, Hoka is still an immature brand.