Customer Reviews Saucony Triumph 19

I bought these shoes about a month ago and they do not fit like the Triumph 17, 18s. They are narrow, there is less cushion and size wise smaller. Maybe it was just the shoe I got? Loved the color! Sadly disappointed - they were my favorite shoes!!

These shoes fit well and are comfortable, but it's very slippery even on dry surfaces. I've already nearly fallen twice in a week.

Purchased because they were super comfortable. Didn't use them for running just for occasional wear and they only lasted just over a year. The sole is still in perfect shape with very little wear and are still super comfortable but the top has started to rip. Will not be buying again.

I've been wearing Triumphs for years but this model is not wide enough. My big toes hurt because they are scrunched in the toe box. If I hadn't worn them for a 3 mile walk I would return them.

I wanted to love these shoes. Very comfortable but within a couple months I had a hole in the toe of the right one and now the left shoe has started coming apart from the sole.

I had 3 pairs of the Triumph 18 and they were amazing. The Triumph 19 is very different. No heel cushioning, so disappointed with this purchase.

This shoe is much shorter by about 1/2-inch than the Triumph 17 & 18 which I own. Inadequate room in length of toe cap - width was fine. I have Medium width feet but on the narrow side of Medium. It seems to me that they are pushing the design toward a sprinting or middle distance shoe. Saucony has a number of quicker shoes. I wish they'd left this one as it was. I'd always liked the extra stability bc of uneven terrain found in x-country running. It's still a good shoe, but it no longer meets my needs. I returned shoes. Been wearing Sauconys 25 years - hope I can find another favorite.

I bought two pairs of these to alternate, wearing them both at work and for my 6 mile runs. Normally they last me about four months Loved the previous models. These not so much. My toe poked through after less than one month of wearing. I've been wearing Saucony for the past 5 years and sadly have to wait until they improve the upper. This time I ordered two pairs of Brooks. Their upper seems a lot more durable. Sad because the Saucony are my favorites for cushion. Also, I dislike the high backs on these. Why do they mess with a good thing?

Shoes were comfortable at first but quickly became more painful to wear

I absolutely loved these shoes. They are very comfortable, feel great to run in. However, I had to buy two pairs, and both only lasted me 3 months. The fabric started to come away from the base of the shoe on the inner part of the toe box. I was pretty upset by this as they were such comfortable shoes, but no point in buying these shoes if they only last you a couple of months.

I would consider these a firm cushioned shoe. I previously had the saucony ride and was looking for more cushioning and these were recommended. There is no noticeable cushion or bounce which I'm missing in these, and I'm getting sore shins during my long runs. I wanted to love these shoes but will have to look for something else.

I've worn prior versions - this one is very disappointing. Shins are killing me with new ones.

Feel smaller front to back and all around since my last pair of Triumph. Not sure what changed but definitely not comfortable and won't purchase again.

So uncomfortable compared to the Cohesion style. I remember donating a pair of Triumph after wearing them twice! Did not keep the receipt nor the box the last time or this time. I'm sticking with Cohesion only!

The wide show felt the same as the medium..had to return to one of your dealers..bought pants instead.

Unfortunately, I can't wear Saucony brand anymore. They changed the toe box in the release before these and the new design had rubbed my toe on my longer foot. I was hoping the problem was fixed by reading some reviews on the newer release. It still rubs my toe. I tried to go with wide widths with the new design, but it still rubbed my toe painfully to where I had to give a second pair away. The narrower or not as thick toe box is a problem for me, so I have had to switch to another brand, same size that fits better in toes. That's sad because I loved the cushioning in this shoe and Saucony in general.

Very dissatisfied with this shoes. I walk for 4 miles and didn't feel any support and cushion. It was not worth the price. So disappointed and I had high expectations with saucony and it was a let down.

They aren't as wide like Hurricanes and I got blisters on my toes. The materiel isn't as flexible and seems to rub morethey are more expensive than the Hurricanes and the Hurricanes are now discontinued. This makes me sad the alternative is not better but more expensive and worse.

I was looking to try something different and these came recommendedI am a big fan of the Brooks Glycerin but wanted to give myself other options. These are similar, however, I ordered two sizes 8 & 8.5 knowing I would keep one. The sizing is way off, 8 was too small, short and tight, the 8.5 should be just slightly bigger and it was more than noticeably bigger, now my fault I should have returned both but I kept the 8.5. Now after several runs I wish I would have returned both and ordered my go to the Brooks Glycerin. These may work for some, cushion is good and the roll of the shoe is good but for me the Brooks is better.

I have worn many varieties of the triumph and loved them. I run in them and wear a pair to work because I am on my feet all day. The cushion was the best part. The 19 has mush less cushion and no longer meets my needs . Neutral high arch foot 150 lbs