Customer Reviews FootJoy Pro SL BOA

Liked the shoes, however my 77 yr old feet had trouble with them. Not Footjoy fault. Had to return them and am trying them again.

I like the shoe but after 14/15 holes I start to feel the sole and if am honest find them quite uncomfortable which I have never felt with any FJ product I have had.

Very solid construction, look really nice. Unfortunately giving me a blister after extended wear, partially solved by swapping the rather bulky (but very shock absorbing) insole for another type. Still not sure they will settle down into the type of comfort previously experienced with Contour. So sadly no, I won't be buying again, but that's not a criticism of the construction, it's just really difficult to know after the try on around the house that pressure points might arise on my rather bunion-y feet. So fellow bunion sufferers beware, they might not suit (even in extra wide).

I ordered same size of the Pro/SL shoes I currently wear, but these are much longer. I will have to exchange them for a shorter size.

I just purchased this shoe after doing a ton of research and reading reviews online. I was very excited to try out the new Pro SL's walking 18 for the first time. I made it through the first five holes, and had to walk back to the truck to change into my older FJ Flex golf shoes because my heels hurt so bad. I now have huge blisters on my heels. I've owned many different brands of golf shoes over the years and have never had this problem. I am really disappointed. Not sure if I should try to keep wearing them to break them in or try to return them for a different shoe. Has anyone else had this problem?

The 10.5 wide is wide at the arch but too narrow at the edges near the ball of my foot. The was no wider choice in a 10.5 The 11 only offered a EEE which would have worked but too long

3 stars as I can't assess the shoes due to covid19. They look ok!. I like the fact they are black and as such easy to clean; had some white shoes before with red bits on - nightmare; don't buy white is my recommendation. Also like the sole with no cleats which can also be a nightmare - spent extra cash always having to replace broken ones which are difficult to get out and the shoes although good for a few weeks are never the same so great that there is nothing to replace. Would have preferred to have played in them before assessing so can't comment on the fit.

Runs a little small/narrow. Even the Extra Wide was Narrow

the fit inst as wide as other XW golf shoes I have received, the inconsistent fit of the shoes both on width and length continues to be an issue for me

Chaussures trs confortables mais pas trs solides

I purchased a pair of Footjoy Pro Sl's after I had seen a lot of hype around them. I wear a uk size 11 in most shoes and trainers, and sometimes a uk 11.5 in running shoes and have done so for 20 years. I initially ordered a pair in a uk size 11 wide, but they just looked and felt too long. So I did some research and found some reviews by golfers on youtube, and they all said that they wore a much smaller size in a Footjoy than in any other shoe brand! In trying to determine what size I needed in a Footjoy Pro Sl, I got my feet measured at a golf club on a Brannock device. My feet measured up as a size uk 10 wide ??? why are the sizes so different from the industry standard??? I tried a size 10 wide, and a 10.5, and they were both too tight around the toe box, even though apparently that was the size that I needed!! The long and short of this is that I think Footjoy are trying to make a sporty golf shoe with a traditional looking toe box at address. It just doesn't work. You have a comfy sporty shoe with a long narrow toe box that your toes have no chance of filling, thus leaving a long gap at the end that just feels weird. I feel that this shape of golf shoe is not the sporty spike less shoe that a club golfer really wants compared to what other brands on the market are offering. If you want a traditional looking toe box on a golf shoe at address then I would go for something like a Dryjoy, but if you want a sporty spike less shoe for the summer then I would recommend another brand to tick all the boxes. I just feel that in the current trendy climate of golf attire that these shoes just don't quite cut it and are left behind by other brands in the style stakes. And yes I sent them back.

Surprised at how stiff these were around the ankle and the side of my foot. Unlike other footjoys I've worn. Will need a lot of breaking in before golf season starts.

Good looking shoes but very stiff out of the box and not comfortable on the ankles and outside of my foot. Very unlike other Footjoy shoes I've gotten over the years. Going to have to break them in slowly before playing.

This is my 2nd pair of Pro SLs this year. Superlights were light, but don't last as well as these. These shoes are designed to hold up well over time. Solid waterproof construction and very stable during setup and swing execution. Not the most comfortable footbed after 10+ miles of walking in a day, but built to last for roughly 500-600 miles ( around 100-120 rounds of golf), as long as you occasionally maintain them. I can vouch for that fully, as that I am on my 694th round walked this year.

The he shoes are very well made and I'm sure would have been great. I ordered the wide fit and unfortunately it was not wide enough.

Ich finde das linker und rechter Schuh unterschiedlich ist und die Passform nicht richtig komfortabel zum Golfen Ich hatte verschiedene Grssen probiert - mich leider fr diesen Schuh entschieden

They seem comfortable enough but are not very good looking.

Excellent shoe but slightly disappointed with the fit. I have worn a pair of size 6UK wide fitting FJ Energize shoes from straight out the box without issue. Therefore, I ordered exactly the same size of Pro SL and have found them to be slightly tighter. I've now worn them for 5 full rounds and they are only now starting to ease off but are still pinching my toes. The sole disign of the FJ Energize is different from Pro/SL which might account for the difference

The shoe looked great however the size was incorrect. The box indicated a W width like I ordered, however the label on the shoes showed M. As a result the shoe was too narrow and I had to return them.

I bought 6.5 UK size thinking that it would fit perfectly as my other shoes fits perfectly. The size is one size bigger, I still find loose. The synthetic material looks a bit cheap. I tried two days on the course, second day I twisted my ankle and had some blisters. Not as comfortable as I thought. I already used so not sure if Footjoy could replace the correct size for me.

Good looking, seems durable. Cleans easily. Just not that comfortable to walk course in.

I think sizing is true to the measuring device. I wear size 9.5 shoe but according to foot measuring device I'm an 8.5. I bought a size 9W and they were still to big. The width was good but it was almost a size to long. I ordered the speith under armour shoe about a month ago 9.5 wide and they were to small in length and width. So I've been having trouble finding a shoe. These shoes are very comfy and I'll be reordering a pair in 8.5W.

I have had foot joys over 30 years and this is the first time to have any problems. have had classics or myjoys