Customer Reviews Arcopedico Lolita

too short

Fabric felt a bit thin. It's knitted but more like a jersy knit than a substantial knit.

These have a very comfortable footbed but are short . I wear an 11 (42) and my toes are at the very end of the shoe. I’ve had a number of Arcopedico shoes, love them, but these are a problem.

Looked nice, felt good putting them on, but had to return then as there was just not enough overall foot support.

I love these shoes, I have 5 of them, but - they don't last very long, the same problem with all 5 - a little hole opens close to the end of the big toe. It is not due to the shape of my big toe, but rather the upper fabric separates from the sole.

These were very cute but for the price ridiculous because they’re basically like a beach shoe or a water shoe. They are made of stretchy material like athletic wear with a very basic soul. The price is no option they were cute for like beachwear etc. However that’s not what I was looking for I was looking for a casual dress shoe which does not.

These shoes run large. They are very comfortable, but in my case, the shape of my nubby toes could be seen right through the shoe material. I much prefer Arcopedico's L14.

Loved the idea of these shoes, but the fabric was just too thin. It was like wearing trouser socks with soles. Disappointed because these were going to be my trek through Paris shoes, but I think not. Still love Zappos however.

I didn’t Iike how the contours of your toes show thru the thin material & the white picks up every little bit of dirt. Stained after wearing less than a day outside. Too late to return these since I wore them outside.

My toe came right to the end of the shoe. Because the upper fabric is stretchy, it didn't seem to matter too much in the initial fitting, but was worried the constant pushing on the upper toe would cause pain over the course of a day's wear. The toe box is very wide and so very comfortable with no pinching. However, there is zero arch support despite the product description saying otherwise. There's a little bit of a "bump" that I think is supposed to be arch support, but it's extremely small as to be almost unnoticeable. It's additionally too far back and completely misses the natural arch. While the fabric does look like a sleeker version of an aqua sock, that fabric works for me in hiking thru the winter rain across the parking lot as it won't stretch or ruin like leather. I also like the slightly padded shoe as I have a standing desk and prefer something a little softer to stand in all day. However, I think the stretchiness of the shoe will not provide adequate support for walking any distance as there is some movement of the foot.

I wanted to like these, but in the search for the perfect pair of travel shoes, I have time to be picky. These didn't make the cut. The stretchy upper outlines every bump on my foot -- especially hammertoes. And arch support was non-existent. As someone else noted, they look like water shoes, and that's not the look I want to take my over cobblestone streets on an upcoming European trip. Back they went.

While these shoes look nice and are comfy, the top material is too flimsy. My bunion clearly stood out; if the material would have been a little sturdier, or thicker, it would improve the shoe. They felt too much like house slippers.

These shoes are very comfy, but they do indeed look like water shoes because of the stretchy upper fabric. I returned them because I was concerned that the fabric would stretch out over time and I didn't want the look of beach shoes.

I really wanted to love these. It's a comfort shoe that can pass in the office. Unfortunately, I had three problems with them. First, shoe liner socks (you know those partial socks that look like ballet slippers) kept slipping down under my foot, so I couldn't wear them with this shoe. That meant problem two -- the sole of my foot rubbed on the inside bottom of the shoe, and that made my feet feel hot and blistery. Third, at the front of the shoe, my toes rubbed on the seam or edge where the knit part meets the sole. That's why the shoe felt a little small. I'd add, too, that the very soft material meant that even with some arch support, the shoe felt unstable.

My mom wears wide shoes and these felt too tight. She did not like the feel of the material. They were returned.

I wear a 7 wide. I ordered at 38. The shoes were far too long and overall too big. I am going to have to return them.

It’s a much mite undtructured shoe than I realized. The material is like athletic wear and doesn’t work for my city life. They are very packable and the color is nice but they just don’t look like a city shoe. I’d wear them at the beach, maybe but I’m returning them. I think the video should have made that clearer.

These reminded me of river shoes. The upper is a thick, stretchy fabric. Probably would be comfortable but they're just too short. My big toe bulges out the front of the shoe and it looks weird.

I loved the feel of these flats, but the top material was so thin that my normal size big toe stuck up into the stretchy fabric. It looked weird, SO I had to return them.

Did not provide the support I needed

I had hoped these would stay on my narrow foot. I ordered a size up knowing Arcopedico runs small but these were an instant "no" the minute I put them on. The elasticized area around the top made the toes curl upward and and press against my toes-- very uncomfortable.

This is an unattractive shoe

Can't have the back rubbing on my heel. I need to return these, and maybe purchase something else with no back

Floppy. Not much holding foot in shoe.

This is a comfy, cute shoe for me. The issue is that I now have a hole in the fabric. I’m not even sure what happened, as I’ve worn these about 10 times and always day to day spots- grocery store, etc.