Customer Reviews Jockey Blended Tapered Boxer - 4 Pack

Material is a little thin and the waist band is the part that really upset me-get a pair of Hanes and compare them to your

Very cheaply made. Feels like something I'd get from a hospital used as a cheap disposable underwear. The fabric is thin and the elastic is very thin and cheap. Won't order again. These won't last long. They run larger than other boxers I've bought.

These appeared to be a decent product online & they're a good fit & cut. BUT For some reason Jockey decided to use absolutely worn out elastic for the waist. These things barely stay up which kinda defeats the purpose of wearing them. I don't see them improving when washed. Don't waste your money.

Poor quality and material. The older boxers were much more comfortable (#61683).

The idea was right but the material wasn't. They're not a soft cotton, they're a stiff cotton.

Do you sell just white boxer shorts ? I do not want fruit of the loom colors.

The band is not covered unlike the older ones. Just the bare band touching your skin

No flexiblility and needs more if im going to buy more

Sizing isn't consistent with other underwear from jockey

Much poorer quality than tailored 100% cotton boxers I purchased last year (no longer available). The thin fabric makes this feel like something they would hand out at the hospital ER when you go in for exam! Very disappointed.

Why isn't it possible to have packs of one single color? What's the point of only offering a mix of 3 colors?

Have purchased these for years. Very disappointing, waistband feels stretched out to the very large size. Not the same quality. Not consistent within the package. I used to be able to buy a set size, now you get a range and that is not as advertised.

Product is very high quality and fits as I expected.

Always trust Jockey for underwear. This was my first disappointment ever. Bought a Medium, my standard size. Washed in cold water, dried on Low, and these shrank to almost a small. They are unwearable.

This is my preferred underwear. The style is unique and desirable. But! The waist band is totally unacceptable. There is nothing worse than a waist band that begins at your waste and as the day goes on quickly end up at your thighs. Buying more is out of the question as the design is great overall but the quality of the waist band is totally unacceptable. Totally uncomfortable as the underwear quickly slides down your (my) body. My size, normally 36, L 36:38; the medium M 32:34 is too small overall though the waste fits better though the rest of the garment is too tight. This design is unique among all brands and have not found an acceptable substitute. With all Jockey's designers and product knowledge can't you resolve this issue, which I am sure is NOT unique to me? Take a look at the waist band in Hanes's boxer shorts. Their style design is not desirable to me, but their waist band is..... implement it and you will have a winner resolving your waist ban problem. .

Very disappointed in the feel of the material. They remain stiff even after multiple washings. Would not recommend these unless you like rough feeling material that remains stiff.