Customer Reviews Under Armour The Original 9" Boxerjock®

GREAT PRODUCT KEEPS EVERYTHING DRY AND IN PLACE I WEAR EVERYDAY FOR WORK I DO HAVE A BELLY AND BAND DOES NOT FAIL

I am a huge Under Armour fan! The only underwear I wear! Theyes feel amazing! You have to worry about it ridding up your Crack. Drys really fast if your sweating vs cotton under wear that stays wet and rubs a blister on your back side. Great product! The only thing I can think that could be improved on is to lose the long white tag they have in the back of the waistband. It's no problem to remove it but I rather not have to deal with it.

As many others have experienced over the last few years the sizing of the 9" boxerjock has been all over the place with each production run. I decided to try the latest version and found it to be back to 100% appropriate to my standards. Proper rise, proper legs, good fit all around. That is saying a lot as previous runs were totally unwearable. I recently purchased "Royal (401) / Steel" in size Large(L). I will be ordering another. To assist knowing which production run I am reviewing it would be helpful to include specifics from the tag. This review is regarding Style: 1277240, Color:401, SU 2016(Summer 2016). The one issue and it applies to almost everything UA ships out lately is the LUDICROUS giant white tags stitched into everything. They are difficult to cleanly remove, unnecessary, and this practice needs to stop. Once the frustrating tags are out this boxerjock is good to go all day.

Like others who have commented, I have worn UA boxer jocks for several years now and have worn the 3 previous versions of the boxerjock. I've always bought the 9" inseam. Each version has indeed fit a little differently -- been slightly longer or shorter or the waist band with stronger or weaker elastic. I loved the fit of the first version I wore, found the second version too tight at the waist (ended up ordering the next larger size but it didn't fit quite right), thought the third version was much better although still slightly tight. However, this version fits me really well in the original size I started with. The waist band seems to have the right amount of elasticity so they don't slide down in back but aren't constricting. I've occasionally tried other brands but haven't found anything that works or feels better. Consider me fully satisfied with this version of the boxerjock. Bought a couple a month ago and am now ordering a couple more.

I like to lounge and sleep in them.

My husband is a big man and it's hard to find things in his size. He loves these underwear and we will be buying more.

This is the best pair of underwear I've ever had. I have tried the Under Armour charged cotton type before as well, but this fabric is much more comfortable. It doesn't ride up, the fabric is durable, it's comfortable to wear against my skin, it breathes well- even in the heat and humidity of summer. This is what I'll be buying from now on.

Ok, lets be honest here if you're shopping at this store you're probably a big guy like me. I wear a size 4xl in these. Normal underwear doesn't stay in place and has caused skin tags on my inner thigh. Normal underwear also causes irritation after wearing for a bit. I got these for the long legs. I have worn them 2 times so far and they DO stay in place. No more irritation. They do a fantastic job as keeping dry on hot days. I'm about to order 2 more pair i love these so much. For the guys out there with skin tags on your inner thigh and looking for a way to reduce the irritation, then these are it. Go ahead and buy a pair, you wont regret it. The only con i have is that it doesn't feel like cotton. The pros out-weigh the con tremendously. Oh, and about the size issue for the few guys and for those of you reading it. Just order you normal size of underwear. That's what i did and they fit perfect.

All Good!

I have been wearing UA Briefs since 2005 and absolutely love them. The solid color Briefs last longer and are more durable than multi color. well worth the money.

I really love the under armour boxer jock. I was more impressed with these than with the Tommy equalivent.

Good q

these boxer briefs give me the best support when I'm sparring or continuous fighting or doing standing jujitsu

Whoa ! if you are female, it is nice to look at !!

Use them for working out and casual wear. Very comfortable and keep equipment where they belong.

Bought for my husband & he loves them will be purchasing more.

So...These are way better than the shorter 6" jock. They don't ride up, they keep me cool and no stink. They are a little tight on my thighs and a tiny bit loose at the waist. I like the little bit of "compression" on my thighs. It helps to keep me moving all day. Also, the waist doesn't flap over like some other brands. I like these and I bought more, so my advice is keep the receipt. I'm roughly 6' and a solid 260 so hope that helps you guys out there.

DXL size chart on item is different that the UnderArmour Size Chart.

I've been ordering this style for a long time and they are great. Very comfortable and long lasting. However, the one thing about this style is the sizing. I'm a big guy and need a 2XL in these and that size is always the right fit for me. But sometimes I get a pair or two from an online order that doesn't fit the same as my other 2XLs. I thought maybe it was just me putting on weight, but this last order confirmed that its not me, its the product. This last purchase consisted of 3 pairs and 2 of those 3 were way too tight and small. It seems that I am running into this problem more often with the Charcoal Gray and the True Heather Gray because my Black and Blue pairs are perfect. I don't know why the color makes a difference in the fit, but for some odd reason this is the case here. The only time I have run in to a 2XL fitting too small is when I order these particular colors. I will try exchanging these for a 3XL and see if that works.

I like to wear under armour when I workout, but also as underwear when I know I'm going to be standing for 10+ hours at work. These boxerjocks have a fly which is nice when wearing them for long periods. They do fit me well. Only two complaints: First, I wish they had an inseam option even longer than 9". I'd like them to come down to just above my knee. I'm 6'2", and the 9" boxer jock ends about 4" from the top of my knee. An 11" or 12" inseam option would be great. Second, as mentioned in other reviews, the grip of tags on these is really annoying. You can pull or trim them off, but you risk damaging the garment, or leaving some tag in place to irritate you while you work and/or workout.

These do run a tad bit shorter than the previous version. I don't notice it in the rear but I do slightly in the front. If you're 5'8" and wear 3XL then you might have a butt issue. I don't think it's due to the boxerjock.

I agree with most of the reviews about how the product has changed and for the worst. I have many 6" and 9" and have been very pleased with the originals and their wearability. The 9"offered now does not fit near as well and the waist keeps sliding down. The fabric is much thinner. Go back to the original, UA is the only brand that I wear and I want to keep buying UA.

I have been wearing under armour underwear for about 11 years now and it seems they are getting worse by the year. I do like them because they are more comfortable than others that I have purchased. But, the ones I received today were measured at 8.25in. inseam and were suppose to be 9in. Also, it's 2017 and I think tagless technology has been out for awhile now. I don't need a 3 layer 5 inch tag which shows 100 different languages on where it is made. Yes, I there is a tear away on the tag but I would still have to somehow cut the rest of it off to stop it from bothering me. Other than those things, not to bad.

Would really appreciate it if they got the sizing correct, I have a L that fits like and XL then I have an XL that fits like M so I bought a XXL and it fits like a 3XL

As others have said, these fit differently compared to the previous version. The leg openings are smaller, the waistband is slightly larger, and the rise (distance from waistband to crotch seam) is shorter. Whether this is a good or bad thing will depend on your own proportions. The other major change compared to the previous version is the giant tag in the back that must be cut out. UA seems to have added these tags to all of their shorts/pants/underwear, and I'm not sure why. They are a huge pain to remove and are a giant step backward in design. Even my UA underwear from 10 years ago were tagless. Please UA, remove the giant tags from everything and go back to the tagless design.