Customer Reviews Jockey Cotton Low Rise Stretch No Ride Boxer Brief 3-Pack

The XL size in this style were too snug before being laundered.

I have purchased these for years and really liked them. This time it seems that the fabric has changed. Not nearly as soft as it feels scratchy. They do not have the same kind of stretch. Disappointed.

Dont agree product description as "stretchy cotton", fit is quite tight (no I didn't gain weight over the holidays) - if I could return them I would.

I only give three stars. First order of large were excellent. About a year ago I bought more size large same as first order BUT the new large feel like medium and my body weight has not changed in fact weigh less now. Wish I knew why such a difference in the same size ??? Just unhappy and all but one pair still in original packaging. It's a shame because I loved the first order So I guess I'm reluctant to order more since they are not inexpensive underwear !!!

Nice fabric feel, good colors, but the shape of these is a bit odd. They're very wide hip to hip while very narrow bellybutton to back. Also a bit low rise. I wish they had a more square shape and a slightly longer inseam. So one star removed for shape and the second for price. These are pricey for what they are.

Gonna have to return these as they are too small as the one size fits all just isn't so. The size spread does not insure they are gonna fit. It would be nice if you could just order your true waist size but that is just not happening with these.

These are all right but I looked for months to find about the same thing with the horizontal fly which I much prefer.

Legs are too short to me. Fit more like trunks instead of boxer briefs.

I am returning them, what I got did not match what was shown, the picture showed legs near mid thigh, but what I got had legs about 2 inches from the crotch

True sizing appears to be a challenge with me...boxer briefs feel small based on other brands I have, with the same size (M). Disappointed I washed and cannot return. Experienced similar sizing challenges with tees. Jockey (L) is quite large and much too baggy for my preference.

I love the feel of these but they don't fit the same as my last ones. Very tight around the legs and waist. Going to try a bigger size even though I haven't changed.

I bought these a few months ago amd I like them for the most part. The only complaint i would have is the fly. My junk keeps jumping and hanging out. Other than that they're not too shabby.

I purchased these a few years ago and loved them. Needed new so I bought these. Not the same. Are made cheaper.

I don't like the BIG JOCKEY branding on the waste band

I personally do not like the material or the length. They did seem true to size and to did nicely though.

Small are 28- 30 , medium are 32-34, could have used 30-32 waist

The active stretch 4" boxer briefs felt a bit heavy. There was to much material in the front. They slid down. They kept their shape after washing. The sizing was good. The quality of these underwear is good.

After numerous washings they continue to shed black lint.

I wear cotton Black Boxer Briefs ONLY And it's impossible to get it. It's annoying. Thanx you!!

ive bought the active stretch boxer briefs before and they were ok, i thought the comfort was good, but the legs always ride up, i purchased more recently and they arent the same same , they seem tighter , as in too tight, and are not as comfortable to wear all day

I wanted to order a 3 pack of white microfiber briefs, but was only able to get all black or different colors. Why couldn't I get what I wanted?

Not sure how I feel about this. Online it is advertised as a low rise boxer brief. The packaging that I received says it is a mid rise boxer brief. They do look different slightly. So overall, Jockey, you failed me. I am sad and dissatisfied, and disappointed.

Waistband gave me a rash around waist after a few months.

I have a terrible skin rash from the waist band. Not able to use them

I did not get what I was wanting. I was looking for underwear with a fly on the inside and the outside but there was only one on the outside.