Customer Reviews Jockey Active Slim Bootleg
Write A ReviewRating Summmary:
1283
1,283 total reviewsReview Breakdown:
64%5Rated 5 stars out of 5
16%4Rated 4 stars out of 5
11%3Rated 3 stars out of 5
4%2Rated 2 stars out of 5
5%1Rated 1 star out of 5
Customer Fit Survey:
93%"Felt true to size"
100%"Felt true to width"
100%"Moderate arch support"
Additional Reviews
Sort by:
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Kinda thin and didn't fit as well as the crop flare yoga pants.also felt cheaper than the crop flares.
Pazuze,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
These pants are comfortable. However, fabric is very thin. And I agree with other reviewers that there should be an inseam measurement between 29 for petite and 31.5 for these. I'm 5' 4", purchased regular. I really need a 30" inseam. I shortened them, but they did not come out very well, due to thin stretchy fabric. Okay to sleep in, that's it.
Zumi's M,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I just got this yesterday. I ordered ps but they sent me psm. I don't have time for them to exchange because I have to wear at work.
Am29,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
Material is more flimsey than it has been in previous purchases
" S,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I bought two of these. One in black and one in blue. I tried on the black pants when I got them assuming they'd both fit the same way. I tried on the blue pant today and it is about one half inch longer than the black and the waist is about the same and way too big. The blue pant is made in Viet Nam and the black in China. Not sure why the difference. At any rate the blue will go back and I gather another blue pant or may not be the same as the black. The black pair was perfect.
Viv28,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
These are nice pants and I like them. They're smooth, soft, fit is okay although the leg with could be about an inch narrower. I am giving them three stars because the right leg inseam is 1 1/2" longer than the left. I will keep them as they have been worn/washed and will see what I can do about the disparity in length.
Lynneb,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Have ordered these over the last year and the first order they were just right except I had to order large when I usually order medium.
Now they are thinner, stretchy, don't hold shape and too big with large need to order medium.
Dwen,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Wished they would have been alittle longer an more streamlined
Jezzie,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I would like a higher rise
I like the fabric with it having a majority of cotton.
Paka,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
These are a crap shootmy first order a couple years ago - one pair was great the other had an almost two inch length difference of the legs.
My recent set - now the fabric has changed to much thinner. Will likely be my last purchase. They are too expensive for the quality.
C B,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I like the fit at the top but not sure about the rest of the pants. They seem to get bigger longer the longer I had them on. I ordered you pants because they come in petite.
Tinkerbellchick,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
These are cute, and would've been fine, except for the fact that they're not slim legged. They are almost straight up and down.
Pebble,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Medium quality, could be softer, a bit longer than expected for the petite sized pants and they run a little ad small. I will be keeping but I don't expect them to be my live in at home lounge pants as I had hoped
SN10306,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I've ordered several of these pants, and I can't say enough great things about them. I love them so much they will last forever very well-made, very flattering. However, this time around I just ordered two black pairs and the material feels different hair is sticking to them where as before the material was not like that also ordered on petite size and their longer than my other pairs were?
Sara R,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
I think these are ok. I doubt I would order them again.
Rocket3232,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
Color was lighter, more of a dove grey and quality was a little less than the price. Very comfy. Size is about a size larger than normal.
Cgrock,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
fits good but too long....washed them to see if would shrink...but didn't
Btn,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I ordered 2 pairs of slim bootleg pants, one in navy blue and one in grey, both medium. The blue pair fits perfectly, but the grey ones are quite a bit smaller. When I hold them up together, the blue one is between 1 and 2 inches larger at the waist. I shall send the grey ones back and exchange for large. I hope the large size will fit me and not be enormous!
Pennie,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
This is my 4th pair of pants and the length is shorter then the others
They will be returned
Sandy..,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Fabric is nice, but very thin. Much thinner than expected. Won't wear until Spring. Can't camouflage any bumps/bulges either. Fit is nice. Ordered a PM. I'm 5'2" about 130 pds with a 28" inseam. A tad long, but I like them that way.
Muffie2022,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I own several pairs of Jockey cotton, cotton/stretch pants that fit comfortably in size Large (I like a loose fit). Ordered these in size Large, and I can tell you that the size was misjudged or mislabeled. They should have been deemed a Small, couldn't even get them to pull over my upper thighs so gave up! If you plan to order be sure to size up one or two to get the fit you like!
SallyB.,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Disappointed as I was replacing a pair I already owned and loved. I was surprised to see that they were not as thick as my previous pair. The previous pair were my "go to" for workouts and travel. I'm on the fence whether to return or keep. I do like the color.
Shep245,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
These are fine for around the house for errands, but the material is thin and n doesn't have that "stretch/supportive" quality.
Jkmc,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
I was not happy with the feel of the material. Wish they had pockets as well.
Charlene S,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
This was the third pair of these pants that I purchased. The length of the pant legs were shorter than previous pairs. I bought another pair, at the same time, for a friend, in a different size. Her pair was also shorter than they should have been.
Annie L,
0 found this review helpful.