Customer Reviews ASICS Gel-Evate™ 3

I always counted on Asics as my go to running shoe but these don't fit like the ones I've worn for years. I have flat feet and over pronate and these were just too narrow and didn't feel as stable as I'm used to with Asics. They were very cute and comfortable so if you don't need a super stable shoe these would probably be great for you.

I ordered 3 different pairs of "under-pronator" Asics to compare/contrast, in order to replace my worn out model which sadly they don't make anymore. Here are my findings: Gel-Evade 3 (this shoe) - When I first put these on, I said, "nope." Out of the three they were the most tight, so if you are in between sizes, or like a looser fit, go up a size. After testing the other two pairs, I went back to them and wore one with another model. I liked them better upon the second chance; they had the most cushioning of the three, the thickest/highest sole. Also the highest arch, and they had the most support under the toe area, making the overall angle of the bottom feel more level and not tipping down. When I loosened the laces quite a ways, they felt ok, but still a sort of tight fit overall, which may have loosened in time/wear. However, after walking around the house for about 15 minutes, the middle of my foot began to feel cramped, even though they were as loose as I could go and still tie them (I agree with other reviews that the laces are too short). If you have super-high arches, this might be the one for you. ASICS GEL-Flux 3 - This one turned out to be the overall most comfortable for me. I have a narrow-ish foot, and usual size 9.5. The 9.5 fit right. I notice a lot of people say to go up 1/2 a size in Asics, but, personally, I don't like the shoe to be too big as it rubs against the back and/or sides of the heel uncomfortably. Snug but comfortable fit. This one felt like it had the most room around the "ball" portion of the foot, which is where I most often get cramps. Also felt the most stiff underneath the foot than the others, but thick and supportive. After comparing by wearing alone, and also by wearing one of one model on one foot, and a different model on the other, then switching feet, I learned out of the 3, this shoe was sort of the "medium"; it had a good amount of cushioning, but not as much as the Gel-Evate, but more than the Gel-Equation. Also, the middle in terms of "level"-ness, the Gel-Equation felt like it pointed downward, the Gel-Evate felt even more level than this one. Out of the three, probably the least high arch, although I felt like the arch is supported, I don't feel it under my arch as closely as the other two. Overall, it just feels the best on my foot. Feels like it does help with my underpronation issue, straightening out my gait a little. Of the 3, this one has the highest cup at the heel, which I like better, feels like my foot is a little more enclosed in the shoe, not exposed at the ankle. Just took them out for the first hour-long walk and no issues or discomfort whatsoever. Gel-Equation - This one actually felt the most comfortable "out of the box". My usual 9.5 felt right on. It feels the most flexible, and also has the biggest toe-box of the 3 I tried, so if that is your issue, this might be your shoe. Both the upper mesh and the sole felt the most flexible. However, while I did feel it helped with the under-pronation problem, there is a lack of support under the toe area. It feels rather thin there, and overall, the sole was the thinnest of the 3 and the least cushioned. Because of the thin area under the toe base, it felt like the shoe tipped downward, maybe this is a "spring-off" feature (?). After wearing for 15 minutes, I felt like this was stressing the muscle behind my thigh, above the knee crease. This one had the 2nd highest arch.

I read the reviews before I purchased these, hoping that the width wasn't as narrow as others stated. Asics aren't making them like they used to; as I've worn them for years. Much too narrow, and a tad too short. They are going back and I'm shopping for another brand.

If you are looking to buy these, look at least one size bigger! I have worn the same exact size in Asics forever, and when I got these I could barley fit my foot in them. I couldn't even do up the laces they were so tight. I even checked the box and the tongue to make sure it was the right size, and it said it was...but, it really wasn't. The shoe was nice overall, a little bright though. I love the Asics brand...just went out and got another shoe, same brand, and it fit just fine.

These shoes were long enough, but much too narrow. In fact, I could hardly get them on my foot. I am amazed at the variation in size interpretation between two pairs of shoes made by the same company! I also ordered Gel-Sendai 2 in the same size and they fit my feet perfectly. Same company...completely different fit.

I always purchase Asics because they have been a sure fit when I order a size 8. Sadly, this shoe was at least a half size too small. Also, I did expect a lot more arch support.

I was expecting this shoe to fit like my Kayanos and was surprised that they were much tighter through the toe box. They go back.

I would have kept these as I love Asics and these fit and felt great right off the bat, but they were defective in that one had a rounded toe box and the other was noticeably pointed. I might try again, but for now I am trying another style.

I have worn Asics forever (20 years) and they have always fit my feet best. These did not fit. They hurt the side of my feet and they are going back.

Beware! These shoes run narrow and short. I'm usually a 10 wide in Asics but not available in this style. I ordered a 10.5 med and way too tight and short-unbelievable.

I Have purchased many asics prior however this particular model is not nearly as comfortable and lacks the arch support of all the others. very disappointed.