Customer Reviews Jockey No Panty Line Promise® Tactel® Hip Brief

I didn't realize they would be so tight around the legs. i do have larger thighs and but not huge and they cut into my leg and left a nasty red line.

These are made of a silky Material not cotton. My fault for missing that detail.

Nice material on body but cut not right for a person like me with large thighs. I much prefer prefer the 'no panty lines' line.

No panty lines but also a soggy sensation due to lack of breathability

Gusset is a little too wide to be comfortable. Size 8

Seem to fit right but very thin. I like the old style better

I only wear your brand of panties. ...ver narrow elastic trim (no panty lines). I recently ordered a 3 of my usual size and they were too small. I held them up next to a lot of my current Jockey panties in the same size, same style, and the pattern is now smaller. There is about 3/4" to 1" less fabric overall and they feel tight. (no weight gain and remember same size for years). Very disappointed.

I thought i had ordered French-cut or high-cut panties. Imagine my surprise when I read hip briefs. I will wear them, but I can't be sure how they will work for me.

They feel and fit great. However, I really was hoping the no panty line promise worked and it doesn't. I am disappointed.

I like these panties... light and comfy but I wouldn't say they are 'no show' panty lines. Seem to get pilly quick.

I was hoping to get underwear that wouldn't show under my yoga pants, like another brand I've bought. But the back of the leg leaves a definite line and a bulge because of the elastic, and not a nice smooth bottom, like anyone would want wearing yoga pants. I was very disappointed.

I love the feel of these. I usually get size 6 in my Jockey underwear. The leg holes did feel a little tight after a day of wearing. If I bought these in the store I might get a size larger.

Very lightweight. If you are an hourglass shape, get a size bigger.

I expected that these briefs would be cotton rather than an artificial fiber. They are okay, but I prefer my old cotton ones.

Are not truly no-panty line .

am not sure how these qualify as no panty line? tight elastic pretty much guarantees that there is a panty line, sorry that these didn't work out.

i am allergic to the writing material so i'm always trying to figure out how to cover up the writing our how to remove it altogether. i applaud Jockey for removing the labels from their panties as they irritated many people. Now if you could switch to a different material for writing the information, The current material causes lots of itching if it touches my skin.

The fabric is amazing. The style and cut are comfortable. True to size except for the elastic around the legs was too tight and left red marks after a day of wearing.

These under pants did not suit me. I prefer that the leg openings are a little more high cut. I'm 5'4" 125 lbs. Just not a good cut for me. I do like the high rise at the waist.

Size runs large. The size 9 was the same size as the all cotton waist size 10.

After one washing the elastic was separating from the material. I have enjoyed Jockey for some years but I find the quality has gone down over that time.

Sigh, if you wear a pantiliner, don't buy these. The pantiliner will not adhere. Which means it adhears to your body. Not fun.

Disappointed. These are not "No Panty Line" underwear. There are so many other brands that provide a much better NO LINES.

The fabric is great, smooth, and comfortable until it comes to the elastic between the legs. They really cut in (for me). The lining doesn't line up too well either. I was really hoping these were going to be as comfortable as the many other pairs that I have. Sadly, no. I really miss the style that they discontinued without the elastic. :(