Customer Reviews Stuart Weitzman Lowland Over the Knee Boot

I love the boots and the sizing was perfect but for stretch, there wasn’t really any. I can see these fitting if you have on stockings, but if you wore these over jeans, it’s way too tight. I wear a size 0, and it was such a tight fit in the calves. The actual shoe however, was a perfect fit. I had to return because of the tight fit in the leg unfortunately.

OMG is all I can say...worth EVERY shiny penny. Get yours before they're all gone!!!

These were very nice, I have very skinny legs so they fit me great, I could see that for some these might be tight in the calf. I didn't care for them pulled up over the knee on me being over 50. What I did do was fold them down and then back up which so that it looks like a cuff. I liked them this way and since I got such a good deal on them I will keep them.

They look very nice, but they felt from the moment I tried them on as they were going to hurt my feet.

Ordered a wide width and it was narrower than my regular-width boots. Thought maybe I just got a mismarked pair so I re-ordered in another color and had the same issue. These run extremely narrow!

Nice boots, nice price, need improve the package box.

the shaft is too wide/bulky

For my first (and maybe last) foray into over the knee (OTK) boots, I finally bought and compared these legendary Stuart Weitzman boots to the Tory Burch Laila boots. I anticipated these Lowlands would be the winners because of their reputation, /status, much higher price point (currently 2.5x more expensive), and lack of heel (I generally prefer flats and the Tory Burch boots have a 2"heel). I was wrong. Both styles had beautiful suede uppers and were very well-made. The Stuart Weitzman reputation is deserved. But the Tory Burch boots fit better, were more comfortable, and looked more stylish on me-- because of their heel! These Lowlands looked a little 'granny' on my lower leg and foot. That said, neither style blew me away so unfortunately I'll be returning them to Zappos. FYI, i have an average proportionate leg with calves that are on the wider side and had no trouble getting either set of boots on. I may next try the Stuart Weitzman Midlands --which have a similar heel height to the Tory Burch pair. Thanks Zappos -- love ya!

I have wide feet and slim legs. These boots are made too wide for the legs.

I love these too much, but even in a wide they're too narrow for me. I have wide feet, but can often get away with a M, (so they're not duck feet.) Usually a wide in any brand that makes them is wide enough. I've worn Stuart Weitzman in heels and loafers with no problem, sadly, not the case here.

Love these boots! I have skinny legs and have always struggled with over the knee boots being huge in the calf/knee/thigh areas. Had some issues with the first 2 pairs but Zappos was extremely accommodating as always. I ordered a size 7 in Londra color. I received a size 71/2 but the box said 7. Zappos sent a 2nd pair but they came in a brown box with no writing and the color of the boot, heel and sole were completely different. The fact they weren't in a Stuart Weitzman box concerned me. The 3rd pair was perfect. I would recommend going down half a size. Otherwise they will bunch around the ankle. I normally wear a 7 1/2,sometimes 8 in boots. The size 7 worked the best for me in these. I have narrow feet and the 7's felt a little snug around toes. There's plenty of room length wise. They feel fine with thin socks. The grey color is great! The look awesome with dresses, skinny jeans and leggings.

The boots were in good condition, however my wife was in search of the Leggylady which is a bit longer than the Lowland.

Expensive, but great fit! I bought the color Logan in a size 8 1/2 & I probably should have bought an 8, but I am going to add an arch support so the 8 1/2 will compensate for that. In fact, I was hesitant about buying them because they don't have a zipper. I didn't know if I would have a struggle getting them on. Actually they go on just like putting on socks & very comfortable & still sexy! The color, Logan, is more khaki-green than pictured. I was a bit disappointed in the color since I was expecting more of a cool-brown color.

My height is 172 centimeters and I am thin, these boots are very beautiful, and good quality, but they are walking with your feet slide! As if I did not delayed the tight leather lace - it flies - was too little in the foot, they are very strange boots.

I wanted to love these boots. I have been looking at them for years. Well, I took the leap and I have to say. Not worth the $. They are not supportive, and the sole is not soft. I love the material, the suede and satin interior. Just felt MEH about them after I tried them on.

I never got to get my foot into these darn iconic boots! Ignore my arch support review, I had no way to mark it "I don't know." They said Wide on the box, but the inside of the boot and bottom were marked "7," and NOT "7Wide." Zappos could not tell me anything about how they are marked or why they did not have a W. SW main number said they did not know. The retail store told me that this year THEY DON'T KNOW WHICH ONES ARE WIDE. The maker did not mark them. The size on the bottom does not customarily show width, HOWEVER, the inside of the shaft should reflect the width and this year NONE OF THE WIDES were marked Wide on the inside. So, I think I got a pair that was not wide. I could not get my foot into the bottom, I felt like Cinderella's evil stepsister. I did think that the length was ok. I am going to try one more time and $870 (price with tax) more to see if the size is right this time. Pray for me ladies!

Very narrow! I even ordered a wide width and it was narrower than my regular-width boots. Thought maybe I just got a mismarked pair so I re-ordered in another color and had the same issue.