Customer Reviews Converse Jack Purcell® CP Canvas Low Top

I love how Jack Purcells looks, but the toe is too narrow for me. I've had a couple of pairs, but can't wear them for long periods of time since my toes are getting totally squished. Sticking with Chuck Taylors.

I am keeping these even though they are a cheaper, less comfortable version of the original pre-Converse Jack Purcells. I had to add an insole, since there's no arch support, and even then I felt a disturbing tug of plantar fascitis after walking in them for a bit. But now that I've worn them, I guess I'll just use them as a basic spring/summer shoe though I don't think I'll be able to walk long distances in them, as I could with the original Jack Purcells. I wish Converse hadn't cheapened this shoe.

Definitely not the same as the original I’ve worn for over 15 years. All the other reviews were right about the quality going down. I changed out the shoelaces which were ridiculously long. I was also disappointed that the insoles are no longer removable. I still decided to purchase these and keep them because I never liked the all star version which I feel are too pointy.

I'm sorry to have to join the masses saying this shoe's quality has seriously declined. Background: I've been wearing Purcells for decades. And yes, I did notice the slow decline in quality over the last few years. But this latest pair (5/18) is of demonstrably lower quality than ever before. They are noticably less cushy underfoot. Noticably thinner sole. Noticably cheaper in the finish, in the way edges are glued down, in the shape of the "smile" and the toe box in general. It's a real bummer, because like so many other buyers, I considered this a go-to shoe that worked in so many outfits. It's now...just another sneaker. The end of an era, I guess. Also, I think their sizing has changed, because after so many decades, I'm now wearing a 1/2 size smaller.

Pain on my pinky toes... They fit about half size smaller and more narrow than my Chuck Taylors

Bought this with the 70s Ox and decided to return these. The shoe itself is really stunning and very attractive on the feet, but there was zero arch support and the foot bed flexed quite a bit and you can see where it would break after a few wears. Too bad, it is a really attractive shoe.

This is not the same shoe. The other reviewers are right. It's much cheaper...I can't figure out exactly what has changed, it's just flimsier and not the same. It seems like a cheap knock off of a Jack Purcell. Sad. I've been wearing them for 20 years, now I have to find a new shoe!

boo. In the past, I bought the Jack Purcell's because of the increased padding and arch support. Now the insoles are as crappy as the chucks. Meh. Looking for a different brand of shoe now.

Like the other reviewers who are long-time Jack Purcell wearers, I'm disappointed Converse/Nike cut corners on the quality and style of the current version of my favorite white go-with-anything shoe. For reference, I started wearing Purcells in 1994. I'm on my sixth pair. The eyelets are in the wrong place; the smile is wrong; the tongue is longer; the toe box is bigger; the sole less stiff. Still, I can't quit these shoes and still haven't found another white shoe that I love as much as the old version of the Jack Purcell, therefore I will continue to wear them. Nike, here's a hint - throwback. Please.

This shoe is not soft. It hurt my feet. The reinforced toe was uncomfortable and the shoe cut into my skin. It offers no support and is too wide for me. Great looking though.

Nice enough shoes, but the toe box for the Purcell is definitely tighter than for regular Converse. I had to go up nearly 3 sizes from what I normally wear in Converse for these to fit.

This is an extremely comfortable shoe, but the picture is misleading. The sole is a cream color that differs from the shoe lace. In addition there is an extra layer of shoe sole at the tip above where the toes are that make the shoe look bulky. Just wasn't what I was expecting so returning.

Bought these for my son for school, on Zappos because we couldn't find this shoe in local stores in his size. Love Zappos' selection! Converse is a cute shoe, I understand why kids like them. But they are not made to be durable, unfortunately. They wear out quickly. It's a shame, too, because Converse could easily increase the quality and durability with little increase in cost to produce.

These shoes are classics. They look great with jeans, shorts, even capris. Unfortunately they are not made like they used to be. They have never really had any arch support or a food insole, but now they are even worse. They are strictly stiff canvas that's cut way to high on the heel and rubs you raw. The toe is now one solid peace of rubber (it used to be made up of 2 or 3). Even the laces are cheap. I have a pair that are about 10 years old that I can no longer wear and bought these as a replacement. Don't do it get some Sperrys or something else that is made with comfort and quality in mind.

These shoes are super comfortable and light but a bit masculine for my tastes. Perhaps because there is less detailing, they have less dress-up potential than regular Converse sneakers. They go well with casual shorts, are okay with skinny jeans, and would probably be better with straight-leg jeans. I would not recommend wearing them with dresses.

The shoe would be good if it wasn't for the size being off. I will be returning this purchase. I was really excited to find this shoe. I wore a pair of these in the 70's and 80's. They lasted great. I will be trying another size. I'm sure that I could rate this procuct higher if it fit right.

These shoes are cute and have great arch support. However, I purchased them with the intention of wearing them as shoes to walk around in all day. They gave me really bad blisters in my heel and were generally uncomfortable after I wore them for more than a couple of hours.

I purchased this shoes for my father. The shoe runs half a size smaller and we exchanged it without a breeze thanks to Zappos amazing service. Unfortunately the shoes weren't comfortable and caused blisters in his feet at the first use. I contacted Zappos and their great customer service solved the problem. Thanks!

I wear women\'s size 12W (C or D width usually). I ordered these in a men\'s 12 since typically sneakers fit small on me. These fit fine, but I will return them because they are not flattering - the white toe looks too much like a clown shoe on my big foot, and I need something more understated.

These look great, but man are they small for their size. I wear a 12 normally in Converses and that’s a little large -- I can wear a really bulky sock and be fine -- and these in 12 pinch across the foot and the toebox is right there. They do look great.

Classic Look and Feel: WYSIWYG - I love simple things, and this shoe is simple. It is a well-made (in Vietnam, of all places) canvas and rubber gym shoe -- a classic design reproduced at a premium price. Don't expect any extra comfort, though there is a very tiny bit of padding on the tongue. The shoe (with athletic socks) feels slightly smaller than other shoes the same size. If you plan on going sockless, order your regular size.

8.5 too big 8 too small - I'm pretty disappointed with the shoe overall. I'm usually an 8.5, but those looked like boats on my feet so I ordered the 8, which fit great length-wise, but they are too narrow and gave me blisters.

Alright - This shoe was alright it was 1/2 a size too big. They also make your foot look large. But they are very comfortable.