Arch in a weird place -
I love my New Balances 1224s (size 8.5D; I'm now on my second pair) and bought these 749s because I wanted something that fit the same as the 1224s, offered decent support, but didn't cost as much. I wanted something that I didn't have to worry about getting dirty, so I could save my 1224s for the treadmill/
gym. And I wanted something in black because very few
women's running shoes are black. This shoe does not fit the way other
New Balance shoes fit. The width of the toebox was a little narrower than the 1224. The length inside the shoe is a little longer, which is weird because the sole is shorter than the 1224, but it was still fairly comfortable (due to the lightweight, stretchy mesh uppers) in the toe box. I would have kept them, except the arch was positioned oddly... the posterior part of the arch extends too far into the heel region; the anterior part doesn't go far forward enough. It's like the whole arch is positioned about 1/2-3/4" too far back. This is really uncomfortable to have the arch so far backwards because it means the arch is sitting under part of your heel and it doesn't support the front of your arch. It's further compounded by the arch being made of the supportive, shock-absorbing material that has much less give in it. So you have a stiff, non-giving material under your the anterior, inside part of your heel. I think if you have a short heel (front to back, I mean), then this would be less of a problem. If you like the comfort of the 1224s, it's well worth the extra money to get those. The 749s do not fit the same way at all. It's like these two styles were designed for completely different feet!